On paving applications, experienced compactor operators feel, hear and see the performance of the machine. Operators feel vibration feedback and know to turn vibration off. The sound of double amplitude drum bounce resulting from vibrating on materials too cool or too dense to permit additional compaction is the signal to the operator to stop vibration. An operator sees the residue of crushed aggregate particles on the surface of the pavement and knows to stop compacting with vibration. The "intelligent compactor" is only able to measure the degree of vibration feedback to sensors mounted onto the machine and cannot determine the cause of the excessive feedback or properly alter the performance of the compactor to compensate for the increased stiffness of the pavement.
The most frequent cause for stiffness increase is cooling of the pavement. The experienced operator knows what needs to be done to mitigate the situation; the compactor does not.
Cause and Effect
Few projects go according to plan from start to finish. Environmental factors, site conditions, material supply and other elements routinely interfere with project plans. Sometimes, conditions will be different day-to-day, or night-to-night in the case of some paving projects. Therefore, contractors should not rely on equipment to work equally as well under varying conditions. The key to achieving optimum work output on the majority of projects is the human factor - experienced people make the difference. No amount of sophisticated equipment can compensate for inexperienced manpower. Experienced manpower will always compensate for the lack of sophisticated equipment.
Quality control during a job by the contractor and the quality control by an agency are two of the most critical specifications contractors must meet on a job. Agencies find it difficult to train and keep competent field technicians. To compensate, they write job specifications that place the burden of in-process quality control testing on the contractor. Quality control testing at the end of a project is retained by the agency so that control of payment is maintained. This way the agency pays for what it gets rather than for what it originally specified.
Contractors take it upon themselves to find and train competent field technicians. The final payment for work performed - especially by governmental agencies - depends upon meeting deadlines and specifications. Many contractors realize the value of real-time quality control testing and keep a technician at work full-time on larger paving projects just to ensure no surprises are discovered after work is completed.
The construction process involves the element of time. Since most construction projects involve a succession of activities, if problems are discovered during final quality control testing, the costs to remedy the situation are expensive. This is one of the main reasons why some agencies believe technologies like "intelligent compaction" will benefit the construction process. In theory, "intelligent compaction" on earthmoving projects can accelerate the construction process. However, this is true only when all other variables of construction can be controlled in the same fashion.
The one variable that is impossible to control is weather. Weather conditions dramatically affect soil compaction applications. Soils that are too dry or too wet are not suitable for effective compaction. Therefore, "intelligent compaction" technology is not the universal solution for soil compaction applications.
Similarly, on HMA applications, time can be the contractor's friend or enemy. When HMA production and delivery is on schedule, laydown and compaction follows a predictable pattern for completion. If the supply of HMA is interrupted - an occurrence with alarming frequency - delays in laydown and compaction are inevitable. As time passes and the mix cools, achieving target density with the paver and compactor train is compromised. "Intelligent compaction" as a technology cannot assist when these complications occur. The cooling of HMA is predictable. The rate of cooling can be pre-determined based on historical information and current ambient conditions.
A well-trained and experienced operator is better able to adjust to the ever-changing conditions encountered on construction projects than the computer-aided compactor. An experienced operator is more adept at adjusting the performance of the compactor to achieve needed results, especially when unpredicted construction delays are experienced. Just as a seasoned airplane captain takes command from the auto pilot system when turbulence or other conditions are encountered, an experienced compactor operator is able to adjust the operating characteristics of the machine when the changing condition of the material call on that operator to do so.