ABC Celebrates District Court’s Ruling Against Davis-Bacon Expansion

Decision reinforces precedent that privately funded projects, including those developed on land owned by municipalities, are not subject to Davis-Bacon

Associated Builders Logo 10944172

Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) celebrated an important decision limiting the scope of the Davis-Bacon Act issued by a U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. In a March 31 decision granting summary judgment to the District of Columbia (the District) and private developer CCDC Office LLC (CCDC), Judge Amy Berman Jackson rejected the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) ruling that the Davis-Bacon Act can be expanded to include privately funded projects.

DOL’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) had concluded that CityCenterDC, a privately funded, occupied and maintained mix-use project of condominiums, apartments, offices, and retail stores that presently sit on a plot of land owned by the District of Columbia, constituted a “public work” within the meaning of the Davis-Bacon Act.

Judge Jackson, who was appointed to the bench by President Obama, rejected the Administration’s argument that CityCenterDC was a public work. Judge Jackson specifically disagreed with DOL’s claim that Davis-Bacon should apply merely because of the District’s role in planning and oversight of the project or because of the project’s incidental benefits to the public. Her ruling is expected to save the District and/or the private developers an estimated $20 million in prevailing wage costs.

“This legal rejection of the Obama Administration’s increasingly overreaching Department of Labor will benefit the public, developers and the merit shop construction industry by reinforcing the precedent that privately-funded projects, including projects developed on land owned by municipalities, are not subject to Davis-Bacon wages,” said ABC Vice President of Government Affairs Geoff Burr.

ABC filed an amicus brief in the case in support of this outcome. ABC’s General Counsel, Maury Baskin, represented the plaintiff developer in the case and argued successfully to the district court.

Latest