Nonresidential Construction Spending Stabilizes in August

Nonresidential construction spending expanded 0.5% in August but remains 3.4% below its year-ago level

Nonresidential spending remains 3.4% below its year-ago level and is down 3.8% from the cyclical peak attained in May 2017.
Nonresidential spending remains 3.4% below its year-ago level and is down 3.8% from the cyclical peak attained in May 2017.

Nonresidential construction spending expanded 0.5% in August, totaling $691.8 billion on a seasonally adjusted, annualized basis, according to an Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Though this represents an improvement from July’s total ($688.2 billion), nonresidential spending remains 3.4% below its year-ago level and is down 3.8% from the cyclical peak attained in May 2017.  

Spending levels expanded in 10 of the 16 nonresidential construction subsectors in August on a monthly basis. The manufacturing subsector experienced the largest absolute monthly decline (-$2.6 billion) and the greatest year-over-year decline (-$16.1 billion).

Spending levels expanded in 10 of the 16 nonresidential construction subsectors in August.Spending levels expanded in 10 of the 16 nonresidential construction subsectors in August.

“Though nonresidential construction spending expanded in August, there is a disconnect between spending data and other data characterizing the level of activity, including backlog and employment,” said ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu. “Collectively, nonresidential construction firms continue to hire, and staffing levels are well ahead of year-ago levels. That is consistent with a busier industry. ABC’s Construction Backlog Indicator (CBI) also continues to show that the average nonresidential construction firm can expect to remain busy, with a significant amount of future work already under contract. But the spending data show that the industry has actually become somewhat less busy over the past year.

“There are a number of possible explanations,” said Basu. “One is that employers may be forced in many instances to replace each retiring skilled worker with more than one employee. This is also consistent with declining industry productivity measured in terms of output per hour worked.“Another possibility is that the construction segments that have been expanding in recent years are more labor intensive than those in which spending has been in decline,” said Basu.

“Spending declines have been especially noteworthy in several capital-intensive public spending segments, including conservation and development and sewage and waste disposal. By contrast, spending increases over roughly the past three years have been apparent in segments requiring many workers specializing in high-quality finishes, including in the lodging and office categories.”

Page 1 of 1658
Next Page